|
>[01.Set.11] Trademarks
– Forfeiture to produce effects only in the future
Source: STJ [Adapted]
The forfeiture of a trademark
registration, based on failure to use by the owner,
shall have legal effects after its declaration is recorded
(ex nunc), instead of retroactive effects (ex tunc).
The decision, by majority of vote, was held by the Second
Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) and reverted
the previous decision in favor of the appeal of the
company Lautrec Publicidade S/A and others, of São
Paulo. When analyzing the issue, the Panel found that
settling forfeiture’s effects for the future is
most suitable as regards trademark registrations, since
it provides greater legal certainty for economic agents
and discourages counterfeiting.
The justice who delivered
the opinion initially pointed out that, unlike nullity,
in forfeiture, the condition for maintaining the registration
ceases to exist, therefore, the legal effects shall
be produced from this moment. The purpose of a registration
is to make it known to third parties, reason why its
cancellation is only effective from its declaration.
The justice also noted that forfeiture is not automatic
and may be repelled when the owner resumes the use of
the trademark even after the end of the registration
term. “The absence of use of the trademark may
not legitimize counterfeiting, committed during the
registration term”, explained the Justice.
According
to her, the ex nunc effects of forfeiture assure the
safety of trade agents, who are responsible for the
development of the country, because, in the contrary,
in case an interested third party confiscates the trademark,
he shall be legitimate to seek compensation for future
earnings from all previous owners.
<
Back
|